|
||
[?]Subscribe To This Site
|
Concern Letter about The Factual Accuracy : This Concern Letter about The Factual Accuracy should be written in The Letter-Pad of the Company. From : The Sender's Name, Door Number and Street's Name, Area Name, City. Postal Code : XXXXXXX Phone Number : 0000 - 123456789 E-mail ID : sendersname@companywebsite.com Date : Reference : TO : Addressee's Name, Designation, The Company's Name, Full Address with Phone Number. Subject : Dear ____, Your April 27 editorial calling upon environmental and healthgroups to be accurate re the factuality of their claims is alegitimate standard. It is also one that could be applied to theeditorial itself. Given your proper concern about factual accuracy, here are somefacts to correct the inaccurate assertion of your openingsentence, which refers to "the discredited campaign to terrify the public about Alar and apples." Like many others in the media, the Journal has fallen for theexpensive, highly effective disinformation campaign waged bythe agricultural chemicals industry for the past five years. Here is what has happened since the Natural Resources DefenseCouncil (NRDC) released its report about Alar and cancer risks tochildren in l989. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) after a thoroughreview of all available data reaffirmed that Alar and its metabolite UDMH were properly classified as human carcinogens. EPA reiterated that the use of Alar on food crops presented an"unreasonable" risk to human health, and that its use shouldremain prohibited. The same conclusion was reached by a scientific peer reviewcommittee convened by EPA to examine the issue. Last June the National Academy of Sciences released a report which reaffirmed the basic premise of the NRDC report, namely that infants and young children are more susceptible to cancer causing agents in food. Last September Federal Judge William Nielson (a Bushappointee) dismissed a lawsuit brought against NRDC and CBSTV's"60 Minutes" challenging NRDC's report, which waspublicized on "60 Minutes." Judge Nielson supported NRDC'scentral premise finding "The government is in grievous errorwhen allowable exposures are calculated...without regard for theage at which exposures occur." I trust that these facts are authoritative enough for the Journal to set the record straight as to which side of the Alar issue is"discredited." Thanking you. Yours Sincerely, (The Sender's Signature) Arlie Schardt Executive Director Environmental Media Services Enc : NOTE : This is a typical Concern Letter about The Factual Accuracy. You have to add your company's name with full address. And the receiver's name and full address also should be added in the place allotted for that purpose. Without those primary details no letter carries any significance. So, you are requested to provide all those important details. Failing which the letter will make a wrong impression about your company and you among the receivers of your letters. This is the most unwanted attitude on your side in dealing with the clients who are the most valued assets of any business organisation. If necessary, leave those spaces blank. Related Links : From Concern Letter about The Factual Accuracy to HOME PAGE |
|
|